W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:21:33 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimKO5HfLQr5i4ihK4NNxK72Fzi7g8pWXsz_XJ7x@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
Cc: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>, Pablo Castro <Pablo.Castro@microsoft.com>, Nikunj Mehta <nikunj@o-micron.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose that we update the current spec to reflect all
> the changes we have agreement on. We can then iteratively review and
> make edits as soon as the remaining issues are solved.  Concretely, I
> would like to check in a fix for
>
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9975
>
> with the following two exceptions which, based on the feedback in this
> thread, require more discussion:
>
> - leave in support for dynamic transactions but add a separate API for
> it, as suggested by Jonas earlier in this thread.
> - leave in the explicit transaction commit
> - leave in nested transactions
>
> The changes in 9975 have been debated for more than two month now, so
> I feel it's about time to update the specification so that it's in
> line with what we're actually discussing.

When you say "leave in the explicit transaction commit", do you mean
in addition to the implicit commit one there are no more requests on a
transaction, or instead of it?

/ Jonas
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 16:22:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:39 GMT