W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: [IndexedDB] Current editor's draft

From: Nikunj Mehta <nikunj@o-micron.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:01:50 +0530
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-Id: <521A6376-54BD-4DB1-832C-0F0B70B61F66@o-micron.com>
To: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
Andrei,

Pejorative remarks about normative text don't help anyone. If you think that the spec text is not clear or that you are unable to interpret it, please say so. The text about dynamic scope has been around for long enough and no one so far mentioned a problem with them.

Nikunj
On Jul 7, 2010, at 11:11 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:

> In fact, dynamic transactions aren't explicitly specified anywhere. They are just mentioned. You need some amount of guessing to find out what they are or how to create one (i.e. pass an empty list of store names).
> 
Received on Friday, 9 July 2010 18:33:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:39 GMT