W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:13:47 -0800
Message-ID: <63df84f0912171513k8041a8as316302e9e2c29735@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Forms WG <public-forms@w3.org>
As Ian already has mentioned. No one is disputing that most of these
things should be factored out of the HTML5 spec. But so far no one has
stepped up to that task. Until someone does we'll have to live with
the reality that these things are defined in the HTML5 spec and the
HTML5 spec alone.

/ Jonas

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Klotz, Leigh <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com> wrote:
> Great!  It sounds like more progress is being made on both putting experience from implementations back into specifications, and in modularizing the XHR document references, since it will give a better place than HTML5 for reference.
>
> Leigh.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbarsky@MIT.EDU]
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 2:38 PM
> To: Klotz, Leigh
> Cc: WebApps WG; Forms WG
> Subject: Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG
>
> On 12/17/09 2:22 PM, Klotz, Leigh wrote:
>> Thank you for the clarification.  Surely then this ought to be fixed
>> with an IETF or W3C document describing this fact
>
> After some pushback, there is in fact such a document being worked on.
> It's not quite far enough to reference normatively last I checked....
>
>> Is it defined in http://www.w3.org/html/wg/href/draft ?
>
> Yep.
>
> -Boris
>
>
Received on Thursday, 17 December 2009 23:15:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:35 GMT