W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: [widgets] test suite: br.wgt

From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:08:32 +0100
Message-ID: <4B27C290.50506@enst.fr>
To: marcosc@opera.com
CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi,

Le 15/12/2009 18:00, Marcos Caceres a écrit :
> Hi Cyril
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Cyril Concolato
> <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>  wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In the test suite, the test br.wgt leads to a widget with no valid start
>> file. I think this should be considered an invalid widget because a Widget
>> UA will not be able to display it, the user may see an icon but nothing
>> happening when activating it. WDYT ?
>>
>
> Looking at the test description from the test suite:
>
> "br.wgt (source files)
> Tests the UA's ability to ignore subsequent repetitions of the content
> element. To pass, the widget start file must treated by the user agent
> as an invalid widget. "
My mistake, I must have misread with one of the above or below example... BTW, maybe you can improve the sentence:
"Tests the UA's ability to ignore subsequent repetitions of the content element. To pass, the widget must *be* treated by the user agent as an invalid widget."
remove 'start file' and add 'be'

Cyril
>
> So yes, it is required to be treated as invalid?
>
> I checked the config.xml and it seem to be ok? :
>
> <widget xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/widgets">
> <name>br</name>
> <content/>
> <content src="fail.html"/>
> </widget>
>
>


-- 
Cyril Concolato
Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor
Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group
Telecom ParisTech
46 rue Barrault
75 013 Paris, France
http://concolato.blog.telecom-paristech.fr/
Received on Tuesday, 15 December 2009 17:08:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:35 GMT