W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

RE: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (4)

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:15:51 -0800
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
CC: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D0B0AB3@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
> "In fact, it is possible that both this scheme and another defined to access Zip archive content would be used jointly, with little or no overlap in functionality."
> Without any other context, this is incomprehensible.
> Suggestion: remove sentence.

Fair enough. The entire section has been removed.

I looked for a version of the document in which the entire
section has been removed. It's still there in 
http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-uri/, and the "Latest Editor's 
Draft" link supplied is 404 Not Found.

If you respond to review comments with a claim that the comment
has resulted in an edit to the reviewed documents, it would
be reasonable to supply a valid pointer to a document which
contains the edits?

Received on Wednesday, 9 December 2009 18:18:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:21 UTC