Re: Length of LC comment period

On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Ian Hickson wrote:
> 
> The requirements were fulfilled, that's why it's ready for LC. It's just 
> not ideal. I'll see if I can come up with some text when I update the 
> spec for LC publication, though.

I've added an issue marker before the ToC.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Wednesday, 9 December 2009 16:03:43 UTC