W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: Length of LC comment period

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:19:31 +0000 (UTC)
To: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0912081418230.16061@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> > 
> > Not currently; I can add some text if you think that would be useful. 
> > I had assumed everyone was pretty much fully aware of the issue.
> 
> Adding some text to the spec would indeed be consistent with the 
> following LC entrance criteria:
> 
> [[
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call
> 
> 2. Fulfill the relevant requirements of the Working Group charter and those of
> any accompanying requirements documents, or report which relevant requirements
> have not been fulfilled.
> ]]

The requirements were fulfilled, that's why it's ready for LC. It's just 
not ideal. I'll see if I can come up with some text when I update the spec 
for LC publication, though.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 14:20:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:35 GMT