W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Selectors CR criteria (was re: Something else)

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:54:08 +0100
To: "Sean Hogan" <shogun70@westnet.com.au>, "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Cc: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.u30xwin1wxe0ny@widsith.local>
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:04:35 +0100, Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au>  
wrote:

> Lachlan Hunt wrote:
...
>> * The implementations must be native implementations in shipping
>>   products.  (JavaScript library implementations don't count).
>>
> What is the reason for the native implementation requirement?
> Is it W3C policy?

Nope. But we figured that we wanted this to be clearly tested for the real  
world, and some people think that insisting on it being native  
implementation shows that more clearly.

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Thursday, 26 November 2009 22:54:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:35 GMT