W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:24:26 -0800
Message-ID: <63df84f0911240924g7cd7eee3se11b3e7b2c049d8f@mail.gmail.com>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Charles McCathieNevile
<chaals@opera.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> this is a Call for consensus to request publishing the Selectors API draft
> at
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/selectors-api/Overview.html?rev=1.101&content-type=text/html;%20charset=iso-8859-1
> as a Candidate Recommendation (assuming Lachy fixes the apparent encoding
> errors, the incorrect URIs and so on as editorial corrections).
>
> The proposed exit criteria are in a separate thread, but essentially are:
>
> For a set of tests based on HTML, CSS 2.1 selectors and this spec, there are
> two implementations that pass every test interoperably, and do not fail any
> "additional" tests based on misimplementing this specification (i.e.
> failures based on not supporting a technology used only in the additional
> tests, such as MathML, will not be taken into account).
>
> Note that the test suite has not been agreed by the Working Group, and will
> not be required for the transition request. Agreeing on a test suite will be
> part of the work we have to do before this spec can move futher than CR.
>
> Please respond yes or no before the end of Friday 27 November. Silence will
> be taken as assent, but this call will not be considered to result in a
> resolution without a "reasonable" level of positive response.

I support this publication.

/ Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:25:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:35 GMT