W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: [webdatabase] Why does W3C have to worry about SQL dialect?

From: Kris Zyp <kris@sitepen.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:53:49 -0700
Message-ID: <4B07F0ED.8020601@sitepen.com>
To: Dan Forsberg <dforsber@gmail.com>
CC: public-webapps@w3.org
Hash: SHA1

Dan Forsberg wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a LAMP based database application without JS on my server
> (well, with PostgreSQL). Now I want to make it Ajax/Offline
> compliant. I've done all my data manipulation/querying with
> pre-coded SQL statements into the PHP application. In last week
> I've tried to find out the right way to do it but noticed that this
> is on-going-work. We have Gears, Dojo Offline, UltraLiteWeb, .. and
>  SQLite supported on Gecko, WebKit, and with Gears in IE. But the
> problem is general syncing support and different evolving
> non-standard interfaces (sigh).
> Syncing should happen under the hood. A web developer should not
> need to worry about how to actually do the syncing.
> In SQL case, it would be nice to have the same script work on
> client side with SQL so that whenever I change the queries etc. I
> can use the same interface on both endpoints.. But instead of
> sticking to SQLite or whatever DB format, why should W3C worry
> about the SQL dialect at all?
> Just standardize the interface to the (SQL) database and let DB
> vendors create browser plugins. This interface you need to define
> anyway. Plus, allow DB specific language passing to the plugin
> (e.g., like SQL). Simple and efficient. In case of single file
> based storage the browser can open one file for each
> domain/security boundary etc. you figure it out.
It sounds like you have just described the WebSimpleDB proposal. It
provides the interface to the DB at the level that one can implement
any query language on top of the DB, whether it be SQLite's SQL,
MySQL's SQL, JSONQuery, FIQL, or to some degree even CouchDB style
"views". Of course these can be implemented by a DB vendor or anyone
else. We at Dojo are certainly hoping to provide at query language
adapter (you mentioned you are using Dojo), I have some FIQL code in
the works.

- --
Kris Zyp
(503) 806-1841
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
Received on Saturday, 21 November 2009 13:54:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:21 UTC