W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: [widgets] About the test suite

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:34:11 +0000
Message-ID: <b21a10670911200934k4e165505h224ca3a699ceb3e3@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Cc: cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote:
> Hi Cyril,
>
> On Nov 20, 2009, at 09:52 , Cyril Concolato wrote:
>> Yes I agree, that should not be difficult, I've already manually created the green/red SVG files. But I was wondering about the order given in the default start files table. For example, if a widget package contains both a index.htm and index.svg, is the UA required to use index.htm ? If this is the case we need to duplicate the tests. If not, we can add the SVG files and use a single test (for most cases).
>
> As Marcos said, if the UA doesn't support HTML it'll look for the SVG instead so you should be good there. But there are at least a few tests (at the very least all those with a <content> element) that fall in a different category and would need to be separated. If we have a process for generating an SVG tree from an HTML tree, I wonder if it might not be simpler than merging the two.
>

Dunno. There are only about 10-20 or so tests that are affected by
this. It's probably easier to do this by hand.

> --
> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Friday, 20 November 2009 17:35:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:35 GMT