- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:43:30 +0100
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- CC: public-webapps@w3.org
Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 17:52 +0100, Marcos Caceres a écrit : >>> I complete agree that manual tests bring a lot of value, but I think it >>> would be unwise to refuse automated tests that express exactly what the >>> spec expresses — in particular, they can be extremely useful to detect >>> bugs in the WebIDL defined in the specs, bugs that are extremely >>> unlikely to be detected through manual testing. >> Like I said, we are certainly not rejecting automated testing, we (me) >> are just not up to that stage yet. I completely agree with you that it >> will help us find more potential bugs in the IDL itself. > > I see, sorry I misunderstood then :) > > Thanks for the clarification, > No probs. I'll be in touch RSN about the automated testing part! Say, about 1 week or so:) I will certainly need your help setting all that stuff up. I don't really know WebIDL, so will probably need your guidance if there are issues. Kind regards, Marcos
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 17:44:10 UTC