W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: [XHR2] timeout

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:41:32 -0800
Message-ID: <63df84f0911100941q7fb53d7eqf5e0ae367822eb14@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
>> I agree that firing readystatechange seems like the most consistent thing
>> to do.
>>
>> I agree that firing timeout (and IMHO abort) on the XHRUpload object
>> unless upload has already finished.
>>
>> In general, I think essentially behaving as if a "timeout" event was
>> fired, and then abort() is called is how we should behave.
>
> abort() has some legacy attached to it that I rather not copy.

Such as?

/ Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 10 November 2009 17:42:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:35 GMT