- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:44:54 -0700
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 23, 2009, at 5:19 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > >> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish new Working Drafts of the >> following specs: >> >> 1. Server-Sent Events >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ >> >> 2. Web Database >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/ >> >> 3. Web Sockets API >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/websockets/ >> >> 4. Web Storage >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/ >> >> 5. Web Workers >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/workers/ >> >> As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and >> silence will be assumed to be assent. The deadline for comments is October >> 26. >> >> See [1] for the rationale for this short review period and the current >> plans for Last Call Working Draft publication of 1, 3, 4 and 5 above. >> >> -Regards, Art Barstow >> >> [1] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0313.html >> > > I support publication of new Working Drafts for all of these. Same here. I continue to think that the "web database" isn't a good approach, but I don't think that should prevent publishing an updated draft. We have done a lot of discussion at mozilla on the subject of what we want a database interface to look like, including with other interested parties as well as web authors. We should have something more concrete shortly. I also continue to miss actual developer demand for server sent events. Seems like it doesn't add a lot of sugar over simply using XMLHttpRequest and progress events. But again, I'm fine with publishing a new WD. / Jonas
Received on Friday, 23 October 2009 20:45:47 UTC