W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: [Bug 7938] SECURITY_ERR when disallowing Database open is inconsistent with QUOTA_EXCEEDED_ERR for disallowing setItem

From: Nikunj R. Mehta <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:06:18 -0700
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Message-Id: <1A0A0A46-0003-41BB-9B5B-DE1F320AB280@oracle.com>
To: Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
The editor's response is fine but why is it asking me to escalate the  
issue to the "HTML" WG? The specs are being discussed in the WebApps WG.

Nikunj

On Oct 21, 2009, at 2:09 AM, bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org wrote:

> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7938
>
>
> Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
>
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 CC|                            |ian@hixie.ch
>             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
>         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2009-10-21  
> 09:09:45 ---
> EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If  
> you are
> satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to  
> CLOSED. If
> you have additional information and would like the editor to  
> reconsider, please
> reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full  
> HTML
> Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug,  
> and suggest
> title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker  
> issue
> yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this  
> document:
>   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
>
> Status: Rejected
> Change Description: no spec change
> Rationale: QUOTA_EXCEEDED_ERR makes sense when you're trying to _set_
> something, because disabling setting is like making the quota zero.
> SECURITY_ERR makes sense when _opening_ something, because that's  
> what's used
> on the platform consistently for that kind of error. I think making  
> these two
> consistent would be inappropriate.
>
>
> -- 
> Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
>

Nikunj
http://o-micron.blogspot.com
Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2009 14:20:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:34 GMT