W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?)

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:15:25 -0700
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org list" <www-dom@w3.org>
Message-id: <E86C38FD-F76B-4C4E-93A6-EDAA90BDB6FE@apple.com>
To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>

On Oct 20, 2009, at 8:03 PM, Brian Kardell wrote:

>> In this particular case, I think anything that's implemented in all  
>> of the
>> major browser engines should be an official standard, not just de  
>> facto.
> Why only in this particular case? :)

I didn't say "only"...

>  As a rule that seems like sound
> guidance.  If it's implemented everywhere, shouldn't you have to make
> a pretty compelling case for it _not_ to be included in an official
> standard?

I agree. The reason I phrased it as I did was to contrast with my  
previous remarks. The "children" attribute should be part of a  
standard, even though it creates what I think is a poor design pattern  
(mix of previous/next and indexed access to the same collection).

Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2009 03:16:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:20 UTC