On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 06:43:18 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >> >> OK, I'll work on it to try and get an editor's draft out tomorrow. My >> rough idea is that you can send an event which has lengthComputable >> false and totalItems / loadedItems, and IFF they have lengthComputable >> true then the loaded and total refer to the particular item - (does >> itemCount start from zero or one?) > > So in a hypothetical system that gives progress for multiple large files > in a row, you can't have a case where some of the files have unknown > sizes? Yes, you can. You also don't necessarily need to get the things in sequential order, actually. (At least the way it is in my head - I ahve to turn it into words on the web still). cheers Chaals ISSUE-105 -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.comReceived on Monday, 19 October 2009 05:51:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:34 GMT