- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:32:15 +0200
- To: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi Art, Would the following suffice? [[ Authoring Guidelines: The only mandatory element in a configuration document is the widget element. All other elements and their respective attributes are optional. The following example shows the smallest possible configuration document that a user agent will be able to process. <widget xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/widgets" /> ]] Kind regards, Marcos On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com> wrote: >> On Oct 7, 2009, at 10:11 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:25 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: >>>> >>>>> (Apologies up front, the following is going to to seem like a rather >>>>> dumb and slightly condescending discussion. I honestly do not mean it >>>>> to be, but its necessary to help me identify where I need to fix the >>>>> specification. Please bear with me.) >>>> >>>> LOL! >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Since the schema and Authoring guidelines are both non-normative, the >>>>>> P+C >>>>>> spec is not clear if an element's attributes are required or not. >>>>> >>>>> When you say "required" (passive voice), do you mean: >>>> >>>> My expectation is the spec will normatively state whether an element's >>>> attributes (e.g. <widget> element has id, version, etc.) are required or >>>> not >>>> in a configuration document. >>> >>> The spec does not set conformance criteria for configuration >>> documents. >> >> Sure it does: >> >> [[ >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/Overview_TSE.html#conformance >> >> There are four classes of products that can claim conformance to this >> specification: >> >> 1. A user agent. >> 2. A widget package. >> 3. A configuration document. >> ]] >> > > Touché, changed it to: > There is only one class of product that can claim conformance to > this specification: a user agent. > > -- > Marcos Caceres > http://datadriven.com.au > -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Thursday, 8 October 2009 15:33:10 UTC