W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: Widget DigSign: Example of a distributor signature document is buggy

From: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:42:26 -0400
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "ext Breitschwerdt, Christian, VF-Group" <christian.breitschwerdt@vodafone.com>, "public-Webapps@w3.org" <public-Webapps@w3.org>, Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>, "Priestley, Mark, VF-Group" <Mark.Priestley@vodafone.com>
Message-Id: <3DCFD86F-AC9B-4CAC-9D17-E4C22BC60A67@nokia.com>
To: ext Kai Hendry <hendry@aplix.co.jp>
I think the first document should be re-titled (since it isn't generic  
to XML Signature 1.1):

Widgets 1.0: Test Suite for Widget Signature 1.0

It also seems we have two types of tests:

1. syntactic tests that check the presence and placement of XML  
material - such as locating the signature in the widget package,  
syntax correctness, presence of required property elements,  and use  
of Role attribute for author and distributor signatures.

2. Signature value verification when specific algorithms are used for  
a given input.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch

On Oct 8, 2009, at 8:07 AM, ext Kai Hendry wrote:

> Hopefully further (correct) examples are here:
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/tests/
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/tests/test-suite- 
> unstable.xml
> Review is very welcome,
Received on Thursday, 8 October 2009 12:43:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:20 UTC