On 02/10/09 23:54, Hodges, Jeff wrote: >> Instead of adding them all in v1, >> we should allow / encourage this kind of experimentation by defining a >> forwards-compatible grammar for the STS header. > > Agreed, see the thread entitled "more flexible ABNF for STS?" That would be a great thing :-) I suggest allowing comma/space-separated key=value pairs or simple tokens, and suggesting an X- prefix for unstandardised keys or tokens. GervReceived on Saturday, 3 October 2009 09:18:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:34 GMT