Re: STS and lockCA

On 02/10/09 23:54, Hodges, Jeff wrote:
>> Instead of adding them all in v1,
>> we should allow / encourage this kind of experimentation by defining a
>> forwards-compatible grammar for the STS header.
>
> Agreed, see the thread entitled "more flexible ABNF for STS?"

That would be a great thing :-) I suggest allowing comma/space-separated 
key=value pairs or simple tokens, and suggesting an X- prefix for 
unstandardised keys or tokens.

Gerv

Received on Saturday, 3 October 2009 09:18:26 UTC