W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:14:57 +0200
Message-ID: <4AC47311.2030409@opera.com>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
CC: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>

Robin Berjon wrote:
> On Sep 23, 2009, at 16:07 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
>> Robin Berjon wrote:
>>> On Sep 21, 2009, at 20:08 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
>>>>> 5.1
>>>>> Localization
>>>>> Shall it be possible for the widget to programmatically discover the
>>>>> localization path it was loaded from (section 9 of P&C)?
>>>> Yes, you can check its URI. If the implementation supports the window
>>>> object, then it possible.
>>> How? window.location will return widget:///foo.html irrespective of
>>> whether the runtime loaded /foo.html or /locales/fr/foo.html.
>> Ah, ok. Yes, forgot about that. Well, the best we can do is give the
>> lang list that the UA is using? Ideas? is this really important? I can
>> see it being useful to know where stuff is being loaded from instead
>> of having to guess where a resource was loaded from.
> I wouldn't call it important enough that it would have to happen in v1.
> Basic functionality would be to expose the UA's known preferred locales,
> but I don't think that's for us to define (it seems like a perfect
> candidate for the navigator object). If you want to make it useful in
> our model you need to be able to find the locale of a given resource,
> which in turn requires a uriToLocale() method.


> I think that it's a lot of work for something that won't be used (though
> of course that could be said of pretty much the entire locale system :~).

Watch your mouth, Monsieur! or no /fr/ widgets for you!:)

> Maybe in v2 we can improve this (e.g. also with a setLocale() call so
> widgets can expose a UI to change language) but for the time being I'd
> recommend not doing it  the cost-benefit ratio isn't worth it and we
> shouldn't do something just for completeness' sake, we're not in the
> elegance business.

Yes, v2 feature.
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:15:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:20 UTC