W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: [widgets] Conformance Checker assertions spec

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:40:59 +0200
Message-ID: <b21a10670909300740s5b798878v99b167d81b17c479@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, public-mwts <public-mwts@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote:
> Le mercredi 30 septembre 2009 à 15:32 +0200, Robin Berjon a écrit :
>> Also, does going to LC again re-open an exclusionary period? I think
>> we can't go to Rec (and probably not to PR) until the exclusionary
>> period is over. Dom?
>
> A new LC opens a 2 months exclusion period during which the group is not
> supposed to go to PR, indeed; the only way to shorten that period is for
> every AC Reps in the WebApps WG to agree to waive their exclusions
> rights - which given the size of the group is likely to be a difficult
> exercice...
>

Ok, well that put an end to my evil master plan, then (And I would
have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for you meddling process
kids! ) :)

I'll leave it to those that know the process better and just focus on
making a good spec and test suite.

-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2009 14:41:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:33 GMT