- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:58:44 -0700
- To: "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>
- Cc: Allen Wirfs-Brock <Allen.Wirfs-Brock@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
Cameron McCormack: > > Indeed, much of the custom [[Get]] etc. functionality can be turned into > > ES5 meta-object stuff. A pertinent question is then: should we change > > Web IDL to specify an ES5 binding (and not ES3) at this point, given > > that specs depending on it want to advance along the Rec track? Mark S. Miller: > Since ES5 will be officially done well ahead of HTML5, I don't see why > not. But I do not know what your "Rec track" constraints imply. For example, Selectors API is at Last Call and will soon be in Candidate Recommendation. I don’t think it can progress further than that until its dependencies move forward. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Saturday, 26 September 2009 22:59:34 UTC