W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: XHR request state vs provisional responses

From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:28:52 +0200
Cc: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-Id: <8A3F7669-064A-417D-A535-32AFD2122173@berjon.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
On Sep 23, 2009, at 16:20 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:34:18 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de 
> > wrote:
>> was it ever discussed to expose information from provisional HTTP  
>> responses (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2616.html#rfc.section.10.1 
>> >) to clients?
>>
>> That might become interesting once extensions such as <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-decroy-http-progress-00 
>> > ever get deployed...
>
> I don't think exposing HTTP 1xx status codes has been discussed  
> before.

Actually I recall them being discussed (I think it was at the Rabat  
f2f) and there being quick consensus that exposing them wasn't useful.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 10:29:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:33 GMT