W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 24 September 2009 Voice Conf

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:15:03 +0300
Message-ID: <b21a10670909230915i74b51cb4lef166d3219bd6746@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Marcin Hanclik
<Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One more comment to the below:
> There is one use case not handled by the below scenarios:
> In case the width/height are dropped on the Widget interface, the widget would not know the initial dimensions.
> E.g. in Win32 each new window get WM_SIZE event with the initial width/height.
> However, I am not sure whether we should mandate the ResolutionChangedEvent to be used for the initial viewport size.
>
> So I would opt for keeping the ResolutionChangedEvent, dropping width/height on the ResolutionChangedEvent, and keeping width/height in the Widget interface.
>

I'm still confused as to why we can't keep both. Is it because of redundancy?


-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2009 16:16:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:33 GMT