W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: [widget-uri] Widget URI ABNF definition comments

From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:55:27 +0300
Message-ID: <26b395e60909150355s397cf374x6e02f8e8c45b22e8@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jere.Kapyaho@nokia.com
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org, robin@berjon.com 
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:49 PM, <Jere.Kapyaho@nokia.com> wrote:
> /4/ Finally, the IRI vs URI naming debate applies as ever. I agree it's
> messy in that we are so accustomed to URIs, but really should be using IRIs,
> and that not everyone is conditioned to mentally replace URI with IRI every
> time. Maybe changing the document name to "Widgets 1.0: Widget Resource
> Identifiers" would sidestep some of the problem. :-)

So we can have URNs, URLs, URIs, IRIs, and WRIs? i'm not sure that's
an improvement :)
Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2009 10:56:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:33 GMT