W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: [Widget URI] Bugs (1)

From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:46:18 +0200
Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-Id: <478BD98E-62D5-4EAC-B387-BE024FD60D52@berjon.com>
To: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
On Jul 26, 2009, at 23:18 , Marcin Hanclik wrote:
> The below 1. could be correct if assumed host is "beefdead".
> I am not sure, however, whether in the widget-URI rule, we use the  
> authority rule from RFC3986, because it is meant to be opaque as  
> specified here:
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-uri/#the-widget-uri-scheme

The idea was for the example to show an authority identifier (because  
it is allowed). The idea is that it comes from the UA, and is opaque  
(even though it has a string representation that matches the authority  
production). I've added a comment to indicate that that is the intent.

Thanks!

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 13:47:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:33 GMT