W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: [widgets] P&C, assertion in wrong spec

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:38:47 +0200
Message-ID: <b21a10670908300938x4cec05bej7ddc7cc5c014ee18@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Robin Berjon<robin@berjon.com> wrote:
> On Aug 28, 2009, at 11:54 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
>>
>> Oh yeah, explaining why would help:) Like with the UI product from the
>> prev email, this UA does not execute or deal with scripts. It only
>> deals with processing config.xml and zip files. It should not behave
>> as a policy enforcement point.
>
> So this could go into the WURI spec, that would make URIs pointing to DigSig
> documents point to nothing?

That is certainly an option. As we don't have a home for this text
right now, can you please add it  to that spec.

Kind regards,
Marcos


-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Sunday, 30 August 2009 16:39:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:33 GMT