- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:50:12 +0200
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- CC: ext Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Arthur Barstow wrote: > On Aug 28, 2009, at 5:24 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote: > >> On Aug 27, 2009, at 17:22 , Marcos Caceres wrote: >>> [[ >>> Note: A user agent that supports the [Widgets-APIs] specification >>> will expose any declared preference to the author at runtime via >>> scripting in the manner described in the [Widgets-APIs] specification. >>> ]] >> >> +1 > > I agree the assertion Marcos cited should not be a requirement for a P+C > UA. > > The proposed text above above would address this bug but I think "will" > is too strong for this non-normative text and "may" would probably be > more appropriate. > > Additionally, the use of *author* in the above is confusing; why is this > particular Actor relevant in this context and how would a Widget runtime > UA know about this Actor. > Agreed. The note should just read: "A user agent that supports the [Widgets-APIs] specification will expose any declared preference at runtime in the manner described in the [Widgets-APIs] specification."
Received on Friday, 28 August 2009 14:50:57 UTC