On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:09:20 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > On Wednesday, August 12, 2009, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> > wrote: >> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:57:51 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> >> wrote: >>> xhr.open("GET", myFile.slice(x, y).fileDataURI); >>> xhr.send(); >> >> FWIW I'm opposed to abusing XMLHttpRequest in this way and I actually >> think that when using the filedata URL scheme some kind of exception >> needs to be thrown. Similarly to when you would use mailto or something. > > Why? Because we'd need to define how this works and define that non-GET, non-null send(), setRequestHeader(), etc. are all not having any effect for filedata URLs. That seems silly. It seems way better to admit that XMLHttpRequest provides an HTTP API and not a File API, in my opinion. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:02:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:33 GMT