- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:54:40 -0700
- To: "Nikunj R. Mehta" <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>
- Cc: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta<nikunj.mehta@oracle.com> wrote: > On Jul 16, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > >> Hi Nikunj, >> >> So one of the things I've never fully understood with your proposal is >> what usage patterns people are going to want to use this new API with. > > Thanks for asking. Please ask me again if this response does not adequately > address your needs. Hi Nikunj, Starting over since I think you misunderstood my question. I do understand how Interceptor/DataCache works. And understand that it's seamless and can (based on a decision made by the browser) seamlessly intercept both XHR requests and <img src=..> requests. What is not entirely clear to me is how you envision that authors will use it. I.e. are you expecting authors to want to intercept XHR requests? Or <img src=...> requests? Or <script src=...> requests? I understand that all of this is possible, but my question is what you expect people to do. I hope that makes sense? / Jonas
Received on Thursday, 16 July 2009 22:55:43 UTC