Re: Web IDL syntax

Shiki Okasaka:
> I see. Thanks Cameron. So even though it seems those can be replaced
> by 'implements', is it not a plan?

They could be replaced with ‘implements’, but not without breaking Java
bindings.  Existing code that compiles against the SVG 1.1 interfaces
might not compile against them if converted to use ‘implements’.  So
it’s not my plan to remove multiple inheritance at the moment, no.

Thanks,

Cameron

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Friday, 10 July 2009 03:55:12 UTC