W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: widgets feedback

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:05:54 +0200
Message-ID: <b21a10670907071005x7c60d4dbtb5fb4debeae711c3@mail.gmail.com>
To: timeless@gmail.com
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 12:17 AM, timeless<timeless@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Marcos Caceres<marcosc@opera.com> wrote:
>> If satisfied with the corrections, please give us
>> an OK for the DoC :)
>
> DoC: OK except for the bits below (and one's a long bit, it'll have to
> wait for the week to start)
>
>>> 9:40 AM The [Widgets-DigSig] specification also defines the naming
>>> conventions for a distributor signature and the naming convention for
>>> an author signature.
>>>   i think you want 'for distributor signatures' and 'for author
>>> signatures' (plural for both)
>>
>> There is only one author signature. I don't want to imply there there
>> can be more.
>
> "an" => "an/the optional" ?
>
> There can be multiple distributor signatures, right?

That is correct.

>> Used "A start file designates the file from the widget package to be
>> loaded by the user agent when it instantiates the widget."
>
> {long discussion about default start file}
>
> Sorry, I'll have to read this at some other time.
>
>



-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2009 17:06:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:32 GMT