- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 19:00:15 +0200
- To: timeless@gmail.com
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 12:25 AM, timeless<timeless@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Marcos Caceres<marcosc@opera.com> wrote: >> Addressed your final set of editorial issues. If satisfied with the >> corrections, please give us >> an OK for the DoC :) > > DoC: OK except for the one below. > >>> 4:37 PM A user agent will acquire a potential Zip archive from a data >>> transfer protocol that either labels resources with a media type (e.g. >>> [HTTP]) or from a data transfer protocol that does not label resources >>> with a media type (e.g., BitTorrent, Bluetooth, etc.). >>> >>> A tautology ... >>> (yes, i know we're trying to say this, but is there a better way to write it?) >> >> I think I will leave it. The point here is to alert the reader that we >> handle both cases. > > Oh, I wasn't asking you to remove it, just rewrite it ;-) > > A user agent can acquire a potential Zip archive both from data > transfer protocols which label resources with media types (e.g. ....) > and from data transfer protocols which do not (e.g. ...). > > I think you already got rid of the e.g.+etc. pair. Yep, I did: "A user agent will acquire a potential Zip archive from a data transfer protocol that either labels resources with a media type (e.g. [HTTP]) or from a data transfer protocol that does not label resources with a media type (e.g., BitTorrent or Bluetooth)" -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Monday, 6 July 2009 17:01:22 UTC