W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: widgets feedback

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 19:00:15 +0200
Message-ID: <b21a10670907061000s75c8056fp567df9ef55183679@mail.gmail.com>
To: timeless@gmail.com
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 12:25 AM, timeless<timeless@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Marcos Caceres<marcosc@opera.com> wrote:
>> Addressed your final set of editorial issues. If satisfied with the
>> corrections, please give us
>> an OK for the DoC :)
>
> DoC: OK except for the one below.
>
>>> 4:37 PM A user agent will acquire a potential Zip archive from a data
>>> transfer protocol that either labels resources with a media type (e.g.
>>> [HTTP]) or from a data transfer protocol that does not label resources
>>> with a media type (e.g., BitTorrent, Bluetooth, etc.).
>>>
>>> A tautology ...
>>>   (yes, i know we're trying to say this, but is there a better way to write it?)
>>
>> I think I will leave it. The point here is to alert the reader that we
>> handle both cases.
>
> Oh, I wasn't asking you to remove it, just rewrite it ;-)
>
> A user agent can acquire a potential Zip archive both from data
> transfer protocols which label resources with media types (e.g. ....)
> and from data transfer protocols which do not (e.g. ...).
>
> I think you already got rid of the e.g.+etc. pair.

Yep, I did:
"A user agent will acquire a potential Zip archive from a data
transfer protocol that either labels resources with a media type (e.g.
[HTTP]) or from a data transfer protocol that does not label resources
with a media type (e.g., BitTorrent or Bluetooth)"

-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Monday, 6 July 2009 17:01:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:32 GMT