W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Points of order on this WG

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:43:14 +0200
To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: "Nikunj R. Mehta" <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>, "Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>, "public-webapps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Jeff Mischkinsky" <JEFF.MISCHKINSKY@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <op.uwjsicu1wxe0ny@widsith.local>
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:03:48 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  
wrote:

> On Jul 4, 2009, at 4:56 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:

>> We are "potentially interested" - i.e. we want to see how the spec  
>> comes out first. Given that this is in the scope of existing  
>> deliverables, and given taht Oracle are providing the resources to edit  
>> it, I see no reason to simply stand in their way.

> I think a B-Tree style storage API would clearly be in scope of existing  
> deliverables. However, it's not clear to me that Oracles's other  
> proposals (programmable http cache, request interception) are. As I  
> understand it, those technologies don't really relate to storage, or  
> even networking as such, but are meant to serve a role similar to  
> HTML5's Application Cache feature. Also, Nikunj's request was to add  
> these things to the charter, from which I infered the charter doesn't  
> already obviously cover them.

As I noted in my earlier message to Nikunj, as far as we (chairs, staff  
contacts and domain lead) can see the features *do* relate to storage, and  
are in scope of the charter as is.

So it's OK, you don't need to worry about the charter changing.

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Saturday, 4 July 2009 14:44:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:32 GMT