W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Points of order on this WG

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 13:56:52 +0200
To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Nikunj R. Mehta" <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>
Cc: "Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>, "public-webapps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Jeff Mischkinsky" <JEFF.MISCHKINSKY@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <op.uwjks2izwxe0ny@widsith.local>
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:06:21 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  

> On Jun 26, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
>> Secondly, Oracle proposes adding request interception and programmable  
>> http cache to the WG's charter. Oracle will provide resources for  
>> editing and reviewing proposals for all three deliverables.
> We already have a broad charter and quite a few deliverables. Before we  
> add more to the charter, I'd like to understand the degree of interest  
> in request interception and programmable http cache. Is anyone besides  
> Oracle interested in pursuing this technology? Are any implementors  
> interested in implementing it?

We are "potentially interested" - i.e. we want to see how the spec comes  
out first. Given that this is in the scope of existing deliverables, and  
given taht Oracle are providing the resources to edit it, I see no reason  
to simply stand in their way. If there turns out not to be interst, then  
it will have a tough time getting to Rec. There are specs people claim to  
be very interested in, but are not prpared to put ay resources into moving  
forward - so clearly general surveys of interest are a poor way of  
understanding reality.



Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Saturday, 4 July 2009 11:58:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:17 UTC