On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, Jonas Sicking wrote: > > This would be a more interesting discussion if someone could actually > come up with a spec for localURL :) Other than lifetime, is there anything major missing from the description I sent originally? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/1110.html > Mostly it's the lifetime issue that concerns me. How long is such a URL > expected to work, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/1148.html > and how do we prevent people from using it longer than that? We don't need to. After it has expired it would act exactly like one of these URIs with a bogus handle. e.g. if the URIs created by this API are of the form local-file:93875, and that is the only particular one that has ever been handed back, then local-file:00000 would return the equivalent of a 404 or DNS error or some such. Then when a URL expires, it goes from working normally to that error state. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Thursday, 2 July 2009 19:48:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:16 GMT