W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2009

RE: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject

From: Kruessel, Steffen <Steffen.Kruessel@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:50:17 +0200
Message-ID: <79C0EA6E7AD7CE4A85EDAF482B5456B202233B2A@EXCHSRV.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>, "Marcin Hanclik" <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>, "Giovanni Campagna" <scampa.giovanni@gmail.com>, "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, <ian@hixie.ch>
If the extended attribute should not be ECMAScript, the description at
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#Callback must also be revised due
to the strong ES-reference.

What about [ValueTypeInterface]?

Regards, Steffen

-----Original Message-----
From: Maciej Stachowiak [mailto:mjs@apple.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 9:15 AM
To: Marcin Hanclik
Cc: Cameron McCormack; Giovanni Campagna; Kruessel, Steffen; WebApps WG;
Subject: Re: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject

On Jun 30, 2009, at 11:29 PM, Marcin Hanclik wrote:

> What about [ESNativeObject]?

I don't think the property should be ES-specific. It would probably  
have effects for other language bindings too. I'm also not sure this  
clarifies the use of Native.

Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 07:51:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:17 UTC