W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: <access> and IRI equivalence

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:57:37 +0100
To: "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>
Cc: "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.urejqbpu64w2qv@macosxp.q42.local>
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:51:02 +0100, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote:
> I phrased this poorly.  The question at hand is whether the spec needs a  
> dependency on HTML's use of URI references, or whether a reference to  
> the URI spec is sufficient.  I suspect that the latter is in fact the  
> case; implementations would still be free to be a bit more lenient.

Wouldn't that lead to interoperability issues?

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 13:58:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:14 UTC