On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:42:02 +0900, Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au> wrote: > Ok, I can see that the use case is consistent with what is in the XBL > spec. I prefer the following wording: > > A XBL binding allows the document to which it is bound to have full > access to the document in which it is defined; therefore cross-origin > XBL usage is prohibited. Ok, changed the wording. (Not exactly as how you suggested it, fwiw.) > I disagree with the security context of a XBL document being the bound > document, but that isn't relevant to this thread. Right. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2009 08:47:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:07 GMT