W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: [cors] ACTION-11 API use cases

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:46:38 +0900
To: "Sean Hogan" <shogun70@westnet.com.au>
Cc: "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
Message-ID: <op.upwfz0gi64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:42:02 +0900, Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au>  
> Ok, I can see that the use case is consistent with what is in the XBL  
> spec. I prefer the following wording:
> A XBL binding allows the document to which it is bound to have full  
> access to the document in which it is defined; therefore cross-origin  
> XBL usage is prohibited.

Ok, changed the wording. (Not exactly as how you suggested it, fwiw.)

> I disagree with the security context of a XBL document being the bound  
> document, but that isn't relevant to this thread.


Anne van Kesteren
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2009 08:47:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:14 UTC