W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:30:30 +0100
To: "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>, "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.upht84cs64w2qv@unknown-00-1d-4f-fa-48-ab.lan>
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:26:16 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>  
wrote:
> Charles McCathieNevile:
>> If anyone objects to this approach (which saves some administrative
>> work and some time), please speak up...
>
> Web IDL is still a WD.  At some point before Rec, I guess selectors-api
> would need to block on Web IDL progressing.  What point should that be?

PR? There does not actually seem to be a requirement in the W3C Process  
document that e.g. a Recommendation cannot normatively reference a Working  
Draft by the way... (Not that it would be a very good situation to be in.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2009 11:31:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:30 GMT