W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:16:25 +1100
To: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20090213001625.GB12788@arc.mcc.id.au>

Jonas Sicking:
> An alternative would be to not mention behavior for undefined at all
> and let it be whatever the default is for WebIDL once that spec makes
> up its mind. It seems more important to me to behave consistently with
> other methods than to have any specific behavior for undefined.

That sounds like the better solution to me.  Of course, that then makes
it incumbent on me to finish those tests reasonably soon to determine
what that default behaviour should be…

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Friday, 13 February 2009 00:17:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:30 GMT