W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: Seeking implementation status of XBL2

From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:17:57 +0100
Cc: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, dev-tech-xbl@lists.mozilla.org
Message-Id: <BB8B899F-F9C7-4D1D-8BF8-C037BA284FD1@berjon.com>
To: Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au>

On Feb 10, 2009, at 00:39 , Sean Hogan wrote:
> There are a few active JS implementation projects:

I don't know if there is precedent in counting JS-based  
implementations as valid implementation to get a spec out the door  
(maybe the Forms WG did it?) but I see no reason not to. In fact, I  
could make the argument that they should count *more* as they allow  
technology to be deployed faster than the browser churn.

Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
     Feel like hiring me? Go to http://robineko.com/
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2009 14:18:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:14 UTC