- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:17:57 +0100
- To: Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au>
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, dev-tech-xbl@lists.mozilla.org
On Feb 10, 2009, at 00:39 , Sean Hogan wrote:
> There are a few active JS implementation projects:
I don't know if there is precedent in counting JS-based
implementations as valid implementation to get a spec out the door
(maybe the Forms WG did it?) but I see no reason not to. In fact, I
could make the argument that they should count *more* as they allow
technology to be deployed faster than the browser churn.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Feel like hiring me? Go to http://robineko.com/
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2009 14:18:33 UTC