- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:29:57 +0000
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi Charles, On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:27:47 +0100, Marcos Caceres > <marcosscaceres@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> I would like to rename "thumbnail" to "screenshot" in the packaging >> spec. As the thumbnail "graphically represents the widget in a running >> state" it makes more sense to call it a screenshot. > > I don't think so - a screenshot is generally a static image while a > thumbnail is just a small representative image. I don't think that any > improvement in semantics justifies changing the spec for this. We already have the <icon> element as the small representative image for the widget, which is why I think screenshot is less confusing than thumbnail. Kind regards, Marcos -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Monday, 26 January 2009 13:30:45 UTC