W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: tag: uri scheme

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:03:47 -0500
Message-ID: <4977E213.5030706@mit.edu>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
CC: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>, "public-pkg-uri-scheme@w3.org" <public-pkg-uri-scheme@w3.org>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Tim Kindberg <timothy@hpl.hp.com>

Larry Masinter wrote:
> Yes, using Zip is a different overall serialization than 
> MIME multipart, but aren't the problem spaces similar enough
> that differences from what is already widespread practice?

MIME multipart would have the side benefit of specifying MIME types.  At 
the same time, authoring might be a little more complicated...

-Boris

Received on Thursday, 22 January 2009 03:05:06 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Larry Masinter: "RE: tag: uri scheme"
Previous message: Larry Masinter: "RE: tag: uri scheme"
In reply to: Larry Masinter: "RE: tag: uri scheme"
Next in thread: Larry Masinter: "RE: tag: uri scheme"
Reply: Larry Masinter: "RE: tag: uri scheme"
Maybe reply: Marcos Caceres: "Re: tag: uri scheme"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:06 GMT