W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: [widgets] Rule for finding a file within a widget package

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:27:03 +0200
Message-ID: <b21a10670906300527u64bd5cddu855431921f331dea@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Anne van Kesteren<annevk@opera.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:20:25 +0200, Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Anne van Kesteren<annevk@opera.com>
>> wrote:
>>> "TO BE WRITTEN, PLEASE IGNORE" if normative material is yet to be
>>> written you cannot enter Last Call. Per
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#return-to-wg it
>>> seems you have to publish this as Working Draft again.
>> You are reviewing the (bleeding-edge) editor's draft, Anne. Not the
>> published one. That is obviously not in the published draft [1], it's
>> just something I put in there yesterday during the F2F and have not
>> had a chance to finish yet... I will finish that bit tomorrow.
>> Obviously, that won't be in the final draft.
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/
> Oh ok. All the more reason the cited process document applies though, methinks.

Understood and I see what you mean. I will continue editing and then
let the chairs and team contacts decide if we need to republish or if
we can proceed to CR. Is that OK?

Kind regards,
Marcos Caceres
Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2009 12:27:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 13:55:26 UTC