W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: [widgets] Rule for finding a file within a widget package

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:27:03 +0200
Message-ID: <b21a10670906300527u64bd5cddu855431921f331dea@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Anne van Kesteren<annevk@opera.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:20:25 +0200, Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Anne van Kesteren<annevk@opera.com>
>> wrote:
>>> "TO BE WRITTEN, PLEASE IGNORE" if normative material is yet to be
>>> written you cannot enter Last Call. Per
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#return-to-wg it
>>> seems you have to publish this as Working Draft again.
>>
>> You are reviewing the (bleeding-edge) editor's draft, Anne. Not the
>> published one. That is obviously not in the published draft [1], it's
>> just something I put in there yesterday during the F2F and have not
>> had a chance to finish yet... I will finish that bit tomorrow.
>> Obviously, that won't be in the final draft.
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/
>
> Oh ok. All the more reason the cited process document applies though, methinks.

Understood and I see what you mean. I will continue editing and then
let the chairs and team contacts decide if we need to republish or if
we can proceed to CR. Is that OK?

Kind regards,
Marcos
-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2009 12:27:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:31 GMT