On Jun 27, 2009, at 22:24 , Doug Schepers wrote: > As we talked about at the SVG F2F, we need to have a discussion > about what the exit criteria for Web IDL will be, since the > implementations are actually other specs, and there is concurrent > development between those specs and Web IDL. This seems to be a > special case with regards to the Recommendation Track... should > other specs be allowed go to CR/PR/Rec before Web IDL? Should we > park them in CR while features of Web IDL are solidified by other > specs, like HTML5? Will there be an updated revision or version 2 > of Web IDL? I wonder what the value is of having it on Rec track in the first place? Could it simply be a Note? > Another possible implementation of Web IDL would be an IDL checker, > like a validator. Or at the very least parser libraries. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ Feel like hiring me? Go to http://robineko.com/Received on Sunday, 28 June 2009 10:50:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:12 GMT