W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 3

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:35:28 +0200
Message-ID: <b21a10670906160435i7102491du806b9dcc685992ac@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi Marcin,

(Sorry, process dictates that I have to keep sending these for each of
your emails:( )

For the sake of the disposition of comments, can you please
acknowledge that you are satisfied with the responses of the working
group in this email thread. A response from you is required for us to
progress the document to CR.  If we don't receive a response by the
21st of June, we will assume you have accepted the comments and no
further action is needed. If further action or clarification is needed
on your part, then please let us know ASAP.

Kind regards,
Marcos

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Marcin
Hanclik<Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Marcos!
>
> Marcin Hanclik
> ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
> Tel: +49-208-8290-6452  |  Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
> Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
> E-Mail: marcin.hanclik@access-company.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: marcosscaceres@gmail.com [mailto:marcosscaceres@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marcos Caceres
> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 6:47 PM
> To: Marcin Hanclik
> Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 3
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Marcin Hanclik
> <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com> wrote:
>> Hi Marcos,
>>
>> Thanks for the fixes.
>>
>>>>> Version attribute
>>>>> "The value of a version attribute is an arbitrary string (possibly empty) that denotes a software version
>>>>identifier."
>>>>> What is software?
>>>>> 8.5 says
>>>>> version
>>>>>    A version attribute that specifies the version of the widget. It is optional for authors to use this attribute.
>>>>> Both shall be aligned.
>>>>
>>>>Right, the first definition is intended to be generic and abstract so
>>>>it can be re-applied in the future if needed.
>>
>> So what about the consistency and our versioning discussion?
>> You already know that you want to re-apply a definition.
>> I think a consistent definition, at least within one document would help in comprehending the topic.
>
> I've just made it:  "The value of a version attribute is an arbitrary
> string (possibly empty)." That's all it is.
>
>
>
> --
> Marcos Caceres
> http://datadriven.com.au
>
> ________________________________________
>
> Access Systems Germany GmbH
> Essener Strasse 5  |  D-46047 Oberhausen
> HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
> Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda
>
> www.access-company.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.
>



-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2009 11:36:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:31 GMT