- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 22:51:20 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: marcosc@opera.com, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Robin Berjon wrote: > On Apr 24, 2009, at 11:12 , Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > Also note that a scheme doesn't necessarily uniquely map to a protocol, so > > > it should probably say "scheme handler". > > > > Right. I thought the same thing. I used "protocol handler" to be > > consistent with HTML5. > > Ah, well before we use different terminology we should have a chat with > someone who knows where that wording comes from in HTML5 and see if > there's a reason to keep it. I've corrected HTML5's terminology. (The word "protocol" is still used in the API, for consistency with other parts of the Web API, e.g. the location.protocol attribute.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2009 23:00:47 UTC