W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: More complete draft for Widgets: Access Requests

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 14:01:42 +0200
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Message-Id: <CF126A2D-1F73-4DD2-BE65-27AE89EC8CD0@w3.org>
Cc: ext Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 21 May 2009, at 03:32, Arthur Barstow wrote:

> One of the problems that at least Arve, Thomas and others have  
> raised, is the lack of clear use case(s) and requirements. I think  
> that information should be included in the FPWD. It would not only  
> help the group work through the details of the model but would also  
> help others understand the rationale and design of the model.

Indeed.  It'll be important to have a clear description of what the  
spec is supposed to achieve.  That will also help to get proper review  
of the specificaton, both by the upcoming Deice API WG and externally.

> Given BONDI has done some related security work, perhaps they have  
> use case and requirements that can be used/leveraged.
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 12:06:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:31 GMT